Tuesday, June 5, 2018

Michael and I listened to...

... a YouTube documentary about Alexander the Great. We had a longish drive to his soccer game yesterday. Michael asked a good question, "How do they know what happened like two thousand years ago?" I tried to be funny, "That's right, 350 BC was before the internet." I'm too dry for Michael. "Kings, emperors, pharaohs couldn't even tweet." Michael: nothing. So I told him even ancient societies – like the Greeks, Macedonians, Egyptians, Persians – had historians, orators, artists, performers, traditions, rituals, poets, bards, craftsmen, scribes, and, you know, ways of keeping a public record and passing info to future generations. They told stories. They sang songs. Then the documentary explained how Alexander's father's tomb was discovered in 1977. It was undisturbed since antiquity and full of informative artifacts. That's cool shit, dude. Michael agrees. I think. And there was a lot of commentary on the influence of Alexander's parents. I guess parenting, whether good or bad, is impactful.... And, my favorite part: It seems Alexander, the warrior extraordinaire, was also a book-lover.

“Alexander was a boy of incredible intellect. His favorite author was Homer. And he regularly slept with a copy of Homer’s poems at his bedside.”
     — History Channel documentary 

“Some of Alexander's strongest personality traits formed in response to his parents. His mother had huge ambitions, and encouraged him to believe it was his destiny to conquer the Persian Empire. Olympias' influence instilled a sense of destiny in him, and Plutarch tells how his ambition ‘kept his spirit serious and lofty in advance of his years.’ However, his father Philip was Alexander's most immediate and influential role model, as the young Alexander watched him campaign practically every year, winning victory after victory while ignoring severe wounds. Alexander's relationship with his father forged the competitive side of his personality; he had a need to out-do his father, illustrated by his reckless behavior in battle…. While Alexander worried that his father would leave him 'no great or brilliant achievement to be displayed to the world,' he also downplayed his father's achievements to his companions. According to Plutarch, among Alexander's traits were a violent temper and rash, impulsive nature, which undoubtedly contributed to some of his decisions. Although Alexander was stubborn and did not respond well to orders from his father, he was open to reasoned debate. He had a calmer side – perceptive, logical, and calculating. He had a great desire for knowledge, a love for philosophy, and was an avid reader. This was no doubt in part due to Aristotle's tutelage; Alexander was intelligent and quick to learn. His intelligent and rational side was amply demonstrated by his ability and success as a general. He had great self-restraint in 'pleasures of the body,' in contrast with his lack of self-control with alcohol.... Alexander was erudite and patronized both arts and sciences. However, he had little interest in sports or the Olympic games (unlike his father), seeking only the Homeric ideals of honor and glory. He had great charisma and force of personality, characteristics which made him a great leader. His unique abilities were further demonstrated by the inability of any of his generals to unite Macedonia and retain the Empire after his death – only Alexander had the ability to do so…. Aristotle taught Alexander and his companions about medicine, philosophy, morals, religion, logic, and art. Under Aristotle's tutelage, Alexander developed a passion for the works of Homer, and in particular the Iliad; Aristotle gave him an annotated copy, which Alexander later carried on his campaigns."
     — Wikipedia

"Alexander earned the epithet 'the Great' due to his unparalleled success as a military commander. He never lost a battle, despite typically being outnumbered. This was due to his use of terrain, phalanx and cavalry tactics, bold strategy, and the fierce loyalty of his troops.... Alexander also recognized the potential for disunity among his diverse army, which employed various languages and weapons. He overcame this by being personally involved in battle.... He is often ranked among the most influential people in history." 
     — Wikipedia

No comments:

Post a Comment